Digital Identity Checks in Telehealth: Balancing Safety and Access

By Your Health Magazine

Your Health Magazine

. http://yourhealthmagazine.net

More Health Technology Articles

Digital Identity Checks in Telehealth: Balancing Safety and Access

Telehealth is a weird mix of the modern and the deeply human. One minute, you are clicking a link in a text message. The next minute, you are telling a stranger something you have not said out loud to anyone. That speed and convenience are the whole point. It is also a risk.

More clinics now add identity checks before or during a telehealth visit. Sometimes it is light, like confirming your date of birth. Sometimes it is heavier, like scanning a government ID and taking a selfie. If you have ever hit a verification screen while you are already anxious, already sick, already late for work, you know the feeling. It is not just an annoyance. It is a little spike of panic. What if I fail this? What if it locks me out?

So the real question is not “Should telehealth verify identity?” It is “How much friction is fair, and how do you keep safety measures from blocking real patients who need help now?”

Why did clinics start checking identity in the first place

A lot of identity checks are a response to very practical problems. Not theoretical ones.

Prescription risk comes first. Controlled substances, high-risk meds, and even common medications can be targeted for diversion. Clinics do not want to hand someone a prescription under a fake name and then spend months unwinding it.

Insurance and billing fraud is another driver. Telehealth made it easier to submit claims. It also made it easier for bad actors to create fake patient profiles, use stolen insurance data, or bill for visits that never happened.

Patient safety and clinical accuracy matter too. If the person on screen is not the person in the chart, you can miss allergies, mix up diagnoses, or document the wrong history. That is not a small paperwork issue. It can turn into harm.

Some clinics also deal with abuse and harassment of staff. People can book appointments under false info to harass clinicians, record visits without consent, or game the system for refunds.

And then there is a quieter reason clinics do not always say out loud. Telehealth is still judged like healthcare, because it is healthcare. When something goes wrong, “We did not confirm who this was” is not a great defense.

What “acceptable friction” actually means for a patient

People throw around the word “friction” like it is a design problem. But in healthcare, friction is emotional. It lands differently depending on what you are dealing with.

If you are scheduling a routine dermatology check, you can tolerate a few extra steps. If you are in withdrawal, in a depressive spiral, or trying to get help for your teen before they shut down again, every extra screen feels heavier.

Acceptable friction usually looks like this:

• Fast to complete, ideally under a minute
  
• Easy to understand, with plain language
  
• Works on a basic phone with weak Wi-Fi
  
• Has a backup plan, so you are not stuck
  

Here is the contradiction people hate, but it is true. A stricter check can be safer, and it can also increase risk if it blocks the right person at the wrong time. You fix one problem and create another. Good clinics notice that trade-off and build around it.

A lot of identity workflows assume you are calm and organized. Crisis does not look like that. Crisis looks like trembling hands, blurry vision from crying, a phone battery at 9 percent, and a brain that cannot handle “Step 4 of 9.”

If you design verification as if every patient is fine, you accidentally filter out the people who are not fine. That is, group telehealth often helps the most.

Common ways telehealth verifies identity and what can go wrong

Not all identity checks are the same. Clinics usually pick from a menu, then combine a few.

Knowledge-based checks include name, date of birth, address, or other personal details. Simple, but stolen data makes it less reliable.

One-time passcodes sent by SMS or email are common. Better, but it breaks when someone changes phone numbers, loses service, or shares a family email account.

Document upload asks for a photo of a driver’s license or passport. Stronger, but it creates access issues for people who do not have an ID, do not feel safe sharing it, or cannot photograph it well.

Selfie match or liveness checks ask you to move your head or blink. This can reduce impersonation, but it fails more often for people with older phones, certain lighting, or disabilities.

Some clinics use third-party identity vendors behind the scenes. That can be efficient, but it adds data-sharing questions and sometimes false flags.

When things go wrong, the failure points are usually predictable:

• You get locked out after two failed tries
  
• The camera will not focus on the ID
  
• The system rejects a real face because of lighting, bruising, a mask, or tremors
  
• The name on your records does not match your current ID
  
• You do not have stable housing, so “address verification” becomes a trap
  

None of this means clinics should stop verifying identity. It means they should stop treating verification like a bouncer at a club. Healthcare is not a nightclub. You are not trying to keep people out. You are trying to keep people safe while letting the right people in.

How clinics can verify identity without blocking real patients

This is where it gets practical. You can do safety checks and still be humane about it.

Start with step-up verification. Begin with lighter checks, then increase strictness only when the risk is higher. A routine therapy visit does not always need the same gate as a visit that involves controlled meds.

Offer two or three paths. If the selfie check fails, let the patient switch to a live agent or a manual review. If the ID upload fails, allow an alternative like insurance card plus date-of-birth confirmation plus a call-back.

Let people verify earlier. If you push verification into the moment right before a visit, you create a cliff. If you offer it at scheduling time or the day before, you give people room to fix issues without missing care.

Make the “why” clear. Patients tolerate more friction when they understand the reason. One sentence helps. “We verify identity to protect your records and prevent fraud.” Not a novel. Just the point.

Avoid punishments that feel like rejection. If someone fails a check, do not say “Access denied.” Say what happened and what they can do next. People in distress read tone as judgment.

Clinics also need to document how identity was verified, especially when there is any risk around prescribing, guardianship, or safety planning. But documentation does not have to mean more patient steps.

A solid internal approach stays simple: record what method was used, record any mismatch and how it was resolved, and record who reviewed it if it needed manual approval. That protects both the patient and the clinician. It also prevents the patient from repeating the same process every time.

Equity, privacy, and the “do I really have to upload my ID?” question

Some patients do not have a government ID. Others have it but do not want to share it with a third-party system. Others have reasons they do not want their identity verified in the usual way, like family surveillance, intimate partner violence, or fear of outing.

Clinics should plan for that instead of acting surprised.

Patient-friendly moves include explaining what data is collected, where it goes, and how long it is stored. It also means separating identity verification from marketing tracking, avoiding storing ID images when you do not need to, and limiting staff access to sensitive uploads.

If your system flags someone, you need a human review option that does not shame them. False positives happen. The harm is how you handle them.

Telehealth also lives on personal devices. That matters. If you send verification links by SMS and a parent or partner controls the phone, you can accidentally create a safety issue. Sometimes the safest identity workflow is the one that asks fewer questions over text and more questions inside a private clinical setting.

If you’d rather start with direct care

All the policy talk is useful, but you still need somewhere to start when you or your family needs help. If you want to skip the endless scrolling and focus on care options, here are a few places people review when comparing next steps.

For families seeking teen-focused services, an option to explore is Adolescent Mental Health Treatment, which can be a starting point if you are trying to understand levels of care and what support for adolescents can look like.

If you are looking for support in New Jersey, and you want a program built around recovery services, see how admissions and treatment planning are typically handled.

And if you are in Massachusetts or looking at programs there, substance abuse treatment in MA is another place people check when they want a clearer picture of treatment options and day-to-day support.

Where is this heading next

Identity checks are not going away. If anything, they will become more common as telehealth keeps growing and as fraud gets more sophisticated. You will likely see more “silent” verification, too, like device signals, account history, and risk scoring that happens without making you jump through hoops.

That sounds convenient, and it can be. But it also raises a fair question. If the system decides you look risky, do you get a clear explanation and a quick path to fix it? Or do you get stuck in an algorithm loop?

The balance is not complicated on paper. Protect patients, protect clinicians, protect records. Then keep access open for people who are stressed, sick, or in a real moment of crisis. The hard part is remembering what that moment feels like on the patient side of the screen.

Telehealth works best when it feels safe and simple. You can have both. It just takes care and a little empathy baked into the workflow.